Note: In Weeks 1-7 you will be submitting news articles, or journal articles, that relate with the subject of the chapters assigned for the week.
Q.1 Articles in the News (20 Points) (1 and Half)
Note: In Weeks 1-7 you will be submitting news articles, or journal articles, that relate with the subject of the chapters assigned for the week.
You will need to upload your submissions, with reasoning to support how the article is relative to the chapters in your textbook.
Reading
Chapter 6: White-Collar Crime and the Business Community
Chapter 24: Antitrust Laws
Chapter 25: Laws of Debtor-Creditor Relations and Consumer Protection
Grading Rubric
| Item | Description | Points |
| Article Choice | Relative news article or journal article uploaded | 5 |
| Application | Proper application of the article chosen to the weekly chapter reading relative to one or all of the chapters assigned. | 5 |
| Reasoning | Student support for the article and specific application to chapter reading citing the text book sections relative to the article. | 5 |
| Submission | Well worded and language specific to the topic presented at a graduate level | 5 |
Q.2 Case Analysis (60 points, 5 pages)
| CASE 6-3 |
| United States v. Gray |
Case Analysis Format
Read and understand the case or question assigned. Show your Analysis and Reasoning and make it clear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts of the chapter we are studying to show your reasoning. Dedicate at least one heading to each following outline topic:
Parties [Identify the plaintiff and the defendant]
Facts [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case]
Procedure [Who brought the appeal? What was the outcome in the lower court(s)?]
Issue [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns]
Explain the applicable law(s). Use the textbook here. The law should come from the same chapter as the case. Be sure to use citations from the textbook including page numbers.
Holding [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?]
Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision]
Do significant research outside of the book and demonstrate that you have in an obvious way. This refers to research beyond the legal research. This involves something about the parties or other interesting, related area. Show something you have discovered about the case, parties or other important element from your own research. Be sure this is obvious and adds value beyond the legal reasoning of the case.
Grading Rubrics
| Criteria | |
| A | Every point in this section is met. |
| B | One point is missed, but the remainder of the requirements is well met. |
| C | More than one point is missed. The paper covers the material but only adequately. |
| D | The paper misses many of the requirements. |
| F | The paper was turned in but does not demonstrate that much work was done. |
| 0 | Nothing was submitted, or the material was in violation of school policies. |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more